"R"의 두 판 사이의 차이

ph
이동: 둘러보기, 검색
(새 문서: ==Functions== * {{c|is.na}} {{break}} ==percentile== > quantile(duration, c(.32, .57, .98)) 32% 57% 98% 2.3952 4.1330 4.9330 {{break}} ==CDF== empirical cdf : {{c|ecdf...)
 
1번째 줄: 1번째 줄:
 
==Functions==
 
==Functions==
 
* {{c|is.na}}
 
* {{c|is.na}}
{{break}}
 
  
 
==percentile==
 
==percentile==
7번째 줄: 6번째 줄:
 
     32%    57%    98%  
 
     32%    57%    98%  
 
  2.3952 4.1330 4.9330
 
  2.3952 4.1330 4.9330
{{break}}
 
  
 
==CDF==
 
==CDF==
14번째 줄: 12번째 줄:
 
https://www.r-bloggers.com/exploratory-data-analysis-2-ways-of-plotting-empirical-cumulative-distribution-functions-in-r/
 
https://www.r-bloggers.com/exploratory-data-analysis-2-ways-of-plotting-empirical-cumulative-distribution-functions-in-r/
 
https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat464/node/84
 
https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat464/node/84
{{break}}
 
  
 
==factor to numeric==
 
==factor to numeric==
21번째 줄: 18번째 줄:
 
  as.numeric(as.matrix( data ))
 
  as.numeric(as.matrix( data ))
 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24187629/how-to-convert-factor-to-float-without-losing-precision-in-r
 
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24187629/how-to-convert-factor-to-float-without-losing-precision-in-r
{{break}}
 

2017년 4월 20일 (목) 14:04 판

Functions

  • is.na

percentile

> quantile(duration, c(.32, .57, .98)) 
   32%    57%    98% 
2.3952 4.1330 4.9330

CDF

empirical cdf : ecdf

plot(ecdf(data))

https://www.r-bloggers.com/exploratory-data-analysis-2-ways-of-plotting-empirical-cumulative-distribution-functions-in-r/ https://onlinecourses.science.psu.edu/stat464/node/84

factor to numeric

as.numeric(as.character( data ))

or

as.numeric(as.matrix( data ))

http://stackoverflow.com/questions/24187629/how-to-convert-factor-to-float-without-losing-precision-in-r